Microsoft91Ƶs president says he doesn91Ƶt think artificial intelligence poses an immediate threat to humanity91Ƶs existence, but governments and businesses still need to move faster to address the technology91Ƶs risks by implementing what he calls 91Ƶsafety brakes.91Ƶ
91ƵWe don91Ƶt see any risk in the coming years, over the next decade, that somehow AI is going to pose some kind of existential threat to humanity, but 91Ƶ let91Ƶs solve this problem before the problem arrives,91Ƶ Brad Smith said in an interview with The Canadian Press.
Smith 91Ƶ a stalwart of Microsoft who first joined the company in 1993 and now doubles as its vice-chair 91Ƶ said it91Ƶs important to get the problems posed by the technology under control so the globe doesn91Ƶt have to be 91Ƶconstantly worried and talking about it.91Ƶ
He feels the way to address potential problems is through safety brakes, which could act like the emergency mechanisms built into elevators, school buses and high-speed trains.
They should be built into high-risk AI systems that control critical infrastructure such as electrical grids, water system and traffic.
91ƵLet91Ƶs learn from art,91Ƶ Smith said.
91ƵEvery movie in which technology imposes an existential threat ends the same way 91Ƶ human beings turn the technology off. (So) have an on-off switch, have a safety brake, ensure that it remains under human control. Let91Ƶs embrace that and do it now.91Ƶ
The remarks from Smith come as a race to use and innovate with AI has broken out in the tech sector and beyond following the release of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot designed to generate humanlike responses to text prompts.
Microsoft has invested billions into ChatGPT91Ƶs creator, San Francisco-based OpenAI, and also has its own AI-based technology, Copilot, that helps users create drafts of content, suggest different ways to word text they91Ƶve written and helps create PowerPoint presentations from Word documents.
But many have deep concerns about the pace of AI advancement. For example, Geoffrey Hinton, a British-Canadian deep learning pioneer often referred to as the 91Ƶgodfather of AI,91Ƶ has said he feels the technology could lead to bias and discrimination, joblessness, echo chambers, fake news, battle robots and other risks.
Several governments, including Canada91Ƶs, have begun devising guardrails around AI.
In a 48-page report Microsoft released Wednesday, Smith said his company is supportive of Canada91Ƶs push toward regulating AI.
Those efforts include a voluntary code of conduct released in September whose signatories 91Ƶ including Cohere, OpenText Corp., BlackBerry Ltd. and Telus Corp. 91Ƶ promise they will assess and mitigate the risks of their AI-based systems, monitor them for incidents and act on issues they develop.
Though the code has detractors such as Shopify Inc. founder Tobi Lütke, who sees it as an example of the country using too many 91Ƶreferees91Ƶ when it needs more 91Ƶbuilders,91Ƶ Smith said in the report that by shaping a code Canada has 91Ƶshowed early leadership91Ƶ and is helping the globe work toward a common set of shared principles.
The voluntary code is expected to be followed by Canada91Ƶs forthcoming Artificial Intelligence and Data Act, which would create new criminal law provisions to prohibit 91Ƶreckless and malicious91Ƶ uses of AI that cause serious harm to Canadians.
The act, known as Bill C-27, has passed its first and second reading but is still being considered at committee. Ottawa has said it will come into force no sooner than 2025.
Asked why he thinks governments need to move faster on AI, Smith said the globe has faced an 91Ƶextraordinary year91Ƶ since ChatGPT91Ƶs release.
91ƵWhen we say move faster, it91Ƶs frankly not meant as a criticism,91Ƶ he said.
91ƵIt91Ƶs meant as a recognition of the current reality where innovation has taken off at a faster rate than most people expected.91Ƶ
But he sees Canada as one of the countries most prepared to handle the pace of AI because universities have long emphasized the technology and cities such as Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver have been hotbeds for AI innovation.
91ƵIf there is a government that I think has a tradition on which it can build to adopt something like this, I think it91Ƶs Canada. I hope it91Ƶll be the first,91Ƶ Smith said.
91ƵIt won91Ƶt be the last if it91Ƶs the first.91Ƶ
But as Canada91Ƶs AI act faces 91Ƶthoughtful deliberation,91Ƶ Smith thinks Canada should consider how it can adopt additional safeguards in the meantime.
For example, during the procurement process for high-risk AI systems, he thinks partners seeking contracts could be compelled to use third-party audits to certify that they comply with relevant international AI standards.
In the report, Smith also threw his support behind an approach to AI that will be 91Ƶdeveloped and used across borders91Ƶ and 91Ƶensures that an AI system certified as safe in one jurisdiction can also qualify as safe in another.91Ƶ
He compared this approach to the International Civil Aviation Organization, which uses uniform standards to ensure an airplane does not need to be refitted midflight from Brussels to New York to meet varying requirements each country may have.
An international code would help AI developers attest to the safety of their systems and boost compliance globally because they would be able to use standards that are internationally agreed upon.
91ƵThe model of a voluntary code provides an opportunity for Canada, the European Union, the United States, the other members of the G7 as well as India, Brazil, and Indonesia, to move forward together on a set of shared values and principles,91Ƶ he said in the report.
91ƵIf we can work with others on a voluntary basis, then we will all move faster and with greater care and focus. That91Ƶs not just good news for the technology world, but for the whole world.91Ƶ
READ ALSO: