Sukhdev Singh and Kashmir Singh Sahota have been fined $6,000 after a judge found them in contempt of an interlocutory order to not occupy or use rental properties in Surrey.
The properties are the subject of a yet-to-be-heard petition from the City of Surrey.
The city alleges in its petition that the respondents failed to obtain required building and occupancy permits as well as city inspections related to renovating and occupying a residential property at 6072 133A St. they bought in 2021, and did 91裸聊视频渆xtensive91裸聊视频� renovations on to build three separate rental units then rented them out.
Justice John Gibb-Carsley noted in his that the City of Surrey claims that the respondents ignored 91裸聊视频渞epeated efforts91裸聊视频� to have them comply with bylaws.
91裸聊视频淭he steps taken by the City of Surrey prior to filing the petition included posting 91裸聊视频榮top work91裸聊视频� notices at the property, warning the respondents several times to halt the renovations and to not occupy or use the property, and issuing bylaw infraction tickets to the respondents,91裸聊视频� the judge noted in B.C. Supreme Court in New Westminster.
On April 14, 2022, city hall obtained the interlocutory injunction from Justice Kenneth Ball and on Sept. 22, 2022, Gibb-Carsley found Singh and Sahota in contempt of the April order.
91裸聊视频淚 have concluded that, in the circumstances of this case, the appropriate penalty is a fine of $6,000 for the breach of the April order,91裸聊视频� Gibb-Carsley decided. 91裸聊视频淔urther, if the property remains occupied on January 1, 2023, the respondents shall pay an additional fine of $13,000, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City of Surrey or by further order of this Court. I also award the City of Surrey special costs for the contempt proceedings in respect of the April order.91裸聊视频�
He also noted in his reasons for judgment that the respondents have been using the upper floor of the house 91裸聊视频渁s a fourth rental unit for tenants,91裸聊视频� in effect, converting a single-family structure 91裸聊视频渋nto an unauthorized and unpermitted 4-plex91裸聊视频� contrary to Surrey bylaws and the British Columbia Building Code.
91裸聊视频淚n the circumstances of this case, where it appears the respondents have blatantly disregarded municipal permitting requirements that are intended to promote and protect the public by establishing minimum standards for safety, I find there is an added element of a public interest,91裸聊视频� the judge said. 91裸聊视频淚n my view, builders who flout municipal building codes and the permitting process should be deterred from doing so.91裸聊视频�
READ ALSO: Surrey councillor presents motion to curb illegal, unauthorized construction
The City of Surrey sought a penalty of $5,000 for each of the respondents, totalling $10,000, as well as another penalty of $10,000 if the occupants of the addition and secondary suite didn91裸聊视频檛 vacate the property by Dec. 1, 2022.
The judge noted the respondents were 91裸聊视频渇rank91裸聊视频� in their submissions to the court, acknowledging they were in breach of the bylaws and the court order.
91裸聊视频淭he respondents stated that they 91裸聊视频榥ever thought it would get this far,91裸聊视频�91裸聊视频� Gibb-Carsley noted. 91裸聊视频淭hey said that so many other people in Surrey are doing the same thing91裸聊视频攖hat is, building and renting suites without permission91裸聊视频攖hat they did not think this would happen. They advised that they have spent thousands of dollars on fees for lawyers and engineers and have made sincere efforts to obtain the required building permits from the City of Surrey, albeit after they had already renovated the property and rented it to the occupants of the addition and the secondary suite.91裸聊视频�
Singh and Sahota told the court they have been trying for months to get the tenants to leave and were only recently secured an agreement for them to move out by Dec. 31. 91裸聊视频淭hey say the occupants are resistant to moving because the respondents charge a low rent and that it is very difficult to find similar rental accommodations in the Lower Mainland,91裸聊视频� Gibb-Carsley noted.
91裸聊视频淭he respondents further informed the court that they are suffering financial hardship in their other businesses and asked the court to have leniency in the penalty imposed.91裸聊视频�
Gibb-Carsley found Singh and Sahota 91裸聊视频渏ointly and severally91裸聊视频� liable for the $6,000 fine.
In 2021, Surrey council directed city staff to investigate 91裸聊视频渆nhanced enforcement, prosecution and public awareness91裸聊视频� in an effort to tackle illegal and unauthorized construction in the city, with an eye to 91裸聊视频渕itigate loss of life, destruction of property91裸聊视频� and ensure compliance with bylaws.
91裸聊视频淚 know we have all been inundated with emails from people91裸聊视频檚 concerns about illegal construction,91裸聊视频� Coun. Jack Hundial told council before it passed his related motion,. He also called on staff to look into how other cities are dealing with this.
Coun. Mandeep Nagra said at the time that stop work orders 91裸聊视频渁re getting ignored all the time, just people rip them up and throw them away. I get a number of phone calls on a daily basis of illegal construction and unauthorized additions and all that.91裸聊视频�
tom.zytaruk@surreynowleader.com
Like us on Follow us on and follow Tom on
